Praveen Arimbrathodiyil vs Union of India : SFLC.in assists in challenging Part II of the Intermediary Rules, 2021 in Kerala High Court

 

A petition has been filed in the Kerala High Court by Praveen Arimbrathodiyil, a free and open-source software (FOSS) developer and a volunteer member of the Free Software Community of India (FSCI), challenging certain provisions of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (hereinafter “Intermediary Rules, 2021”). The Petitioner is represented by SFLC.in’s legal director, Prasanth Sugathan, and counsels at SFLC.in. The petition has been admitted and notice has been issued to the respondents.

The Petition has been filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing Part II of the Intermediary Rules, 2021, and declaring them violative of the Article 14, 19 and 21. The Ministry of Information Technology and Electronics (hereinafter “the MeitY”) had notified the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules of 2021 vide Notification No.G.S.R.139(E). on  25th February 2021. Some important features of the Intermediary Rules, 2021 include segregation of social media intermediaries into the two categories of “social media intermediaries” and “significant social media intermediaries”; requirement to prominently display privacy policy and usage of personal data by the aforementioned intermediaries; requirement to remove certain information by exercising due diligence, among others. The Intermediary Rules, 2021 are broader in scope than the draft Intermediary Rules, 2018 which were put out for public consultation.

The main grounds challenged in the Petition are - 

  1. The Intermediary Rules, 2021 place unreasonable restrictions on users in expressing themselves online, thus impacting their right to free speech and expression and fundamental right to privacy. 

  2. The terms used in the Intermediary Rules, 2021 s are vague and ambiguous. 

  3. The  Intermediary Rules, 2021  seek to undermine end to end encryption which is a subset of fundamental right to privacy as enshrined in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India (2017). 

  4. The Intermediary Rules, 2021 draw no intelligible differentia between not-for-profit FOSS communities and for-profit proprietary companies.  

  5. The Intermediary Rules, 2021 place a huge compliance burden on FOSS entities or services thus, impacting their right to trade and business.  

  6. That there was a  lack of stakeholder consultation in contravention of the Government of India’s Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy.  

  7. The rules are in contravention to Shreya Singhal V. Union of India (2015). 

  8. The Intermediary Rules, 2021 prescribe technology-based solutions such as automated tools which would bring in inherent societal biases and prejudices leading to more problems than it intends to solve.  

  9. The Intermediary Rules, 2021 are a delegated legislation and are ultra vires as they are inconsistent with the Information technology Act, 2000 i.e. the parent legislation. 

  10. The Intermediary Rules, 2021  also place an adjudicatory role on intermediaries. 

(You can read our analysis of the Intermediary Rules, 2021 here)


A copy of the petition is attached here for reference.