Ambedkar Community Computing Center(AC3)

Bridging the Digital Divide

SFLC.in supports Ambedkar Community Computing Center (AC3) as a part of our charter to contribute towards education of lesser privileged children.

Basic computing knowledge has become a prerequisite in the job markets. We see around us a digital divide. This digital divide is between children who have an access to computers; its knowledge; and the world wide web, and those children who though functionally literate have no operational knowledge of computing.

About AC3:

New Gurupanpallaya, Sudarshan Layout is a slum like any other in the booming IT hub of Bangalore situated off Bannerghatta Road. It is here that Ambedkar Community Computing Center (AC3) started on July 6, 2008.

Based on community computing model, it is an empowerment initiative within the local community to bridge the widening of the digital divide using FOSS. At AC3, the children are taught how to operate computer, work on basic applications, which allow them to prepare documents, spreadsheets, use GIMP for images, and more. Over and above these, they are taught to access internet, use email, search the web, use chat and do other such basic tasks. All these are done with the help of free and open source software. After successful completion of the basic course and proper evaluation, AC3 encourages the higher courses to be organic. Each student is encouraged to identify their areas of interest and the core staff at SFLC.in helps them pursue their interest in the field.

With AC3 we have seen a sea change in our students. Coming from backward castes with an economic scarcity they have made the most of the opportunity and their time at AC3 has led to an improvement in their entire outlook toward life and their own future. Each of our students have many stories of how they overcame their digital divide. They now operate computers with the ease and skill expected from children of their age of the developed world.

AC3 has been covered by various newspapers from its inception. One such link is http://www.hindu.com/2008/12/15/stories/2008121550260200.htm.

Future plans: 

We seek to extend the reach of this project to more such slums and take this community computing model to as many under privileged children as possible. It is also proposed that children demonstrating willingness should be further trained in higher skills. We also propose to start an active Mentor and Entrepreneurial Incubation cell. Under this, IT industry volunteers will be assigned to mentor successful graduates from AC3, so they may be guided in their professional life skills. Technical and infrastructural backup to aid such entrepreneurial spirit will also be provided.

AC3 is at present limited to one center and a bunch of professionals from FSMK and SFLC.in who have dedicated themselves to quality education of slum children. With the introduction of proficiency certificates being handed out and placement-cell guidance, these students shall become equipped for jobs in information technologies companies. The impact is far more than mere education. It offers these children a chance to have a better future and escape the vicious poverty cycle, thanks to the freedom of free and open-source software.

Update Posts

Weekly Patent Watch: Huawei’s Neural Network for Video Compression

Title: Independent Positioning Of Auxiliary Information In Neural Network Based Picture Processing Application Date: 08/11/23…

We are proud to launch our video series, Protecting Press Freedom in the Digital Age,…

Vote Link Phishing Scam: Recovering A Hacked X Account

Social media accounts today are more than communication tools. They often hold years of personal…

SFLC.in condemns the recent directive issued by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI) ordering a blanket freeze on the enrolment of the 2026 graduating batch of NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad for protesting against the invitation of the Chief Justice of India Surya Kant as the chief guest at their upcoming convocation. While we acknowledge the subsequent withdrawal of this directive following widespread public outcry, the initial order is a glaring example of regulatory overreach that is firmly unconstitutional, ultra vires, and violates the fundamental right to privacy and right to practice a profession of the students. The deployment of such arbitrary measures on the eve of India’s 80th Independence Day deeply undermines the Constitutional freedoms we are entitled to as citizens; the very freedoms which were secured through the tireless advocacy and sacrifices of lawyers including the father of the nation, Advocate Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. The peaceful expression of dissent, which includes submitting representations regarding university affairs and organising/engaging in peaceful protest, is a core component of the fundamental right to free speech and expression protected under Article 19(1)(a), which forms part of the “Golden Triangle” of the Constitution of India. Additionally, attempting to strip law students of their fundamental right to practice their profession by enrolling as advocates with the Bar and earn a livelihood as a retaliatory measure for exercising their constitutional rights is arbitrary and violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 21 of the Constitution. Neither the Advocates Act, 1961 nor the Bar Council of India Rules confer any statutory authority upon the BCI or its Chairman to enforce collective punishment, or withhold professional registration via enrollments. In fact, as per Section 25 of the Advocates Act, 1961, the power to receive applications, verify qualifications, and enroll advocates lies solely in the State Bar Councils. Of further concern is the directive’s call for the university to profile those students and teachers who participated in the protests, identify the signatories to the joint representation, and place additional scrutiny on those that proliferated the representation on social media. This amounts to a demand for the surveillance of students exercising their fundamental rights, and reflects a disturbing and growing pattern, which is the weaponisation of regulatory frameworks and legal regimes that are meant to protect citizens into instruments of state surveillance and intimidation. It is important to note here that while the restriction on enrollment has since been withdrawn, the direction to institute an inquiry remains in force, and is yet to commence. While SFLC.in welcomes the withdrawal of the Chairman’s directive restricting enrollments, the threat of punitive action is not fully dissipated. SFLC.in will continue to closely monitor the situation to ensure that no student or faculty member is subjected to vindictive inquiries, digital tracking, or arbitrary administrative retaliation.

SFLC.in condemns the recent directive issued by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India…

Galley